Terminal Ballistics,
From First Principles
Why sectional density, not velocity, not caliber, governs how a hunting bullet actually kills: derived, not asserted.
The master variable
Build the penetration law from Newton’s second law and one integral, and watch frontal area quietly take over.
The same cartridge gets opposite reputations.
Modern .308 Winchester ammunition drives a 150-grain bullet as fast as a .270 Winchester. People hunt moose with the .270 and call the .308 “marginal.” Both can’t be true.
The gun world explains this with a folk taxonomy: this cartridge is a “deep penetrator,” that one is “explosive,” this one has “knockdown power.”
Only Newton. Every equation here is force equals the rate of change of momentum.
Every quantity in this deck is a mass, a length, a time, or something built from them by that law: momentum p = mv, force, pressure, density. Nothing else is invoked, and no quantity is ever squared for its own sake. Where a v² appears, it is a momentum flux and you will see it derived.
Units: grains (1 gr = 64.8 mg), inches, feet per second, and SI where the arithmetic is cleaner. The reference load throughout is a .308″ 180-grain bonded bullet arriving at 2,700 ft/s.
A soldier who rebuilt mathematics in a prison camp.
A lieutenant of engineers in Napoleon’s 1812 march on Russia, Jean-Victor Poncelet was left for dead at Krasnoi, taken prisoner, and held two years at Saratov on the Volga. With no books, he rebuilt geometry from memory and founded projective geometry in the process.
Home in Metz he turned to mechanics and military engineering and one brutally practical question: how deep does a projectile bury itself in earth, masonry, or flesh? His answer is the resistance law F = a + b·v². Everything below derives it from Newton and then integrates it.
Poncelet (1788–1867) is one of the 72 engineers and scientists whose names are engraved around the first stage of the Eiffel Tower.
The medium pushes back for two reasons. Derive both from momentum.
1 · The medium has strength
Crushing a hole takes a stress R (force per area) whatever the speed. Over the face area A that is a constant force. Creep or sprint, it is paid the same.
2 · The medium has mass
In time dt the face sweeps a volume Av dt, a mass ρAv dt, and throws it aside at a speed κv. Momentum handed over per second: ρAv × κv. By the third law that is the force back on the bullet.
A bullet in tissue obeys the Poncelet equation.
Two tolls. A steady tearing toll (a) to rip tissue apart, the same whether the bullet is racing or crawling, and a plowing toll (b·v²) for shoving mass aside, which grows with the square of speed. At impact the plowing dominates by a factor of thousands; only in the last inch is the tearing toll all that is left.
Along the wound track, integrate Newton to a full stop.
Note what dropped out: b/a = κρ/R. The argument of the logarithm contains neither mass nor area. Mass multiplies depth; area divides it; velocity only enters through ln(1 + u), and u ≈ 5,452 at 2,700 ft/s. The strength term is small at any hunting speed, but it is the floor of the logarithm: without it the bullet would never stop.
Where the momentum goes: most of it in the first hand-span.
Solve step 4 for w as a function of depth instead of stopping at the end point, and the whole track falls out in closed form:
The force decays exponentially with a length scale m/2b ≈ 2.4″. Half of the bullet’s momentum has been handed to the medium by 3.5″, ninety percent by 11″; the first foot takes about 1.6 ms. The violence is front-loaded, which is exactly where gel shows the stretch cavity.
Penetration is expanded sectional density, times a logarithm.
Write the expanded area as a disk of diameter D = k·d and the retained mass as f·m₀. Expanded sectional density factors into the three things a bullet engineer controls:
Surviving mass and a lean-and-heavy start add depth; fattening steals it, and because a face is a disk, fattening counts twice. Double the mushroom’s width and you quarter the depth.
What a 50% increase in each input actually buys.
Take the logarithm of the closed form and differentiate. The elasticities, the percentage change in depth per percentage change in each input, are exact:
For u ≫ 1, ε ≈ 2/ln u: it is 0.25 at 2,000 ft/s, 0.23 at 2,700 and 0.21 at 4,000, and it keeps falling. A unit of recoil momentum spent on bullet mass buys about 4 times the depth that the same unit spent on velocity buys.
Why cartridges converge
Once retention and expansion are pinned by design, wildly different loads stop at the same depth.
Why wildly different cartridges stop at the same depth.
Bonded bullets pin two of the three dials by design, and makers cluster the third:
The benchmark everyone quotes was written in Miami, 1986.
On 11 April 1986, eight agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation cornered two heavily armed bank robbers on a Miami street. Early in the fight a 9 mm round hit Michael Platt and stopped just short of his heart. A wound that should have ended the fight didn’t: Platt kept shooting, and two agents were killed and five wounded.
The post-mortem verdict wasn’t “wrong caliber.” It was too little penetration; the bullet never reached the vitals. So the Bureau stopped arguing calibers and built one repeatable test: a duty bullet fired into calibrated 10% ordnance gelatin must stop between 12 and 18 inches. That window is the yardstick behind every gel number in this deck.
It is a defensive standard for stopping a human; big game often wants more, which is why bonded hunting loads already sit past it near 21″. Gel is a consistent yardstick, not a 1:1 model of tissue.
More speed does not mean more penetration.
Inside the expansion window, two effects fight to a draw:
- faster → deeper, but only through ln(1 + u): elasticity ≈ 0.23
- faster → wider mushroom → more area → less depth, as 1/k²
They cancel. An expanding bullet is self-regulating. The chart runs the closed form with an empirical expansion ratio k(v) and retention f(v); the flat band is not drawn in, it is computed.
Copper “pencils” because it cheats area.
A lead mushroom is a continuous disk: big A, wide channel, shallower.
Copper opens into stiff petals with gaps between them. The medium passes through the gaps instead of being swept, so the effective A in κρAv² collapses, and since X ∝ m/A, depth shoots up.
Add near-100% retention, and if the petals shear off you’re left with a near-caliber slug that drives 30″ or more.
At fixed caliber, extra weight is length, not width.
Mushrooming is a front-end event, set by construction and velocity. A heavier same-caliber bullet doesn’t open wider; it trails a longer intact shank. Weight acts on the mass term, not the area term, and ∂ ln X/∂ ln m = 1: depth is exactly linear in mass.
The linear rule holds until the bullet can’t hold its shape.
Too light: a 30-grain wafer
The stagnation stress on its face, ρv², exceeds the strength of lead. It fragments and tumbles, and depth collapses.
Too heavy: a 600-grain rod, length ≈ 9 diameters
It bends and yaws in fluid; lead is no rigid penetrator. Depth becomes erratic.
Two cavities. Only one is reliable.
Permanent crush cavity: the hole actually punched
Frontal area × path length, A·X. Always wounds. This is the reliable kill.
Temporary cavity: stretch
The medium is thrown outward at a speed proportional to v, so the force profile F(x) sets its size. Tissue that cannot stretch that fast (liver, kidney) tears; lung and muscle spring back. Reliable only above roughly 2,000–2,600 ft/s.
“Momentum dump” isn’t a wounding mechanism at all; the next slide shows how little momentum there is to dump.
The animal cannot be pushed harder than the shooter is.
The bullet’s momentum at impact is mv₀ = 9.6 N·s for the reference load, and that is the most it can ever deliver to the animal, gel, or anything else: momentum is conserved, and the medium gets it all when the bullet stops inside.
The rifle delivered that same bullet momentum, plus the powder gas, into the shooter’s shoulder: about 13 N·s for a .308 Winchester. By the third law the push on the animal is never larger than the push on the shooter.
Every great cartridge spends its budget differently.
.45-70 Government
diameter + mass: a wide, slow hammer. No stretch at all.
.300 magnum
wide channel + depth: velocity buys both, at the cost of recoil.
6.5×55 Swedish
extreme sectional density: a deep, gentle dart.
The optimization
Run the model forward and it points at one specific bullet — one the market has already built.
Crush volume does not depend on caliber or expansion at all.
The area cancels exactly. For a given retained mass and impact speed the bullet punches a fixed volume of hole; expansion only decides its shape, trading depth for width one-for-one. That is the trade the .45-70, the .300 magnum and the 6.5×55 were making on the previous slide.
Downrange, the same momentum flux governs retained velocity.
In air the strength term vanishes (air has no crush strength) and the momentum-flux term is all that is left, with a shape factor c that varies slowly with speed and the air density ρair:
Sectional density sets the retention length, just as it set the penetration depth. The sporting “ballistic coefficient” is σ₀ divided by a form factor: the same quantity in different clothes. For the 7 mm bullet on the next slide, L ≈ 1,883 m.
Fix the sectional density and the caliber choice is a budget, not a debate.
Hold σ₀ at 0.29 (enough for 24″ with margin) and the impact velocity inside the expansion window. Then bullet mass is σ₀d², and both of the things caliber still controls scale with it, linearly and together:
Every step up in caliber buys crush volume in exact proportion to recoil. There is no optimum in the mathematics; there is a budget. Most people place a 4 kg rifle well up to about 4.5 m/s of recoil velocity, and that budget spans .264 to .308 inches with 7 mm in the middle.
The physics asks for .284″. The market already built it.
This is the 7 mm Precision Rifle Cartridge firing a 170-grain Federal Terminal Ascent: a bonded bullet at about 2,950 ft/s, ballistic coefficient 0.646, sectional density 0.301. The made-up ideal and a real factory load are the same object.
Efficient cartridges plateau early. Overbore ones keep climbing.
.308 Winchester: small case, fast powder, essentially all burned by ~20″. Past that the gain shrinks to a trickle, a few ft/s an inch, trending toward zero. Going the other way, every inch you cut costs ~20–25 ft/s; chop it to a 6″ stub and you’ve gutted it: unburned powder, a fireball, hundreds of ft/s gone.
7 mm Precision Rifle Cartridge, .300 magnums: overbore, slow powder still accelerating the bullet at the muzzle. Roughly 30–37 ft/s per inch and still climbing at 26″; they need that length just to realize the case. Their plateau is real too; it sits further down the bore.
More case, barely more bullet.
A .30-06 Springfield burns about 17% more powder than a .308 Winchester. At the muzzle that buys only ~4% more velocity. Momentum shows exactly where the rest goes.
- peak pressure is capped by the brass: a bigger case can’t raise it, only stretch the tail
- the bullet is already moving fast, so it crosses the late inches, where the extra powder burns, almost instantly and at falling pressure
- +17% powder adds only ~4% to the area under the curve → ~4% more bullet momentum
Why the debates never end
The internet argues along the flat axis and ignores the steep one.
Most of the debate runs on bullets that came apart.
The convergence assumed one thing: retained mass barely moves, f ≈ 0.93–0.97. Cheap cup-and-core bullets shatter that premise.
- rapid cup-and-core designs (the Hornady SST and dozens like it) can shed 35–50% of their mass
- the lost mass becomes a snowstorm of lead: hundreds of fragments flung inches past the wound, through meat the bullet never touched
- retained m collapses, so X ∝ m/A craters: the same launch weight now penetrates far less
Caliber is the flat axis. Construction is the steep one.
Hold the construction fixed and the caliber fight really is a plateau: the six bonded cartridges earlier all stopped near 21″. Pin one caliber and one bullet weight, change only how the bullet is built, and measured gel penetration runs from ~17″ to ~32″. It nearly doubles, exactly as f/k² predicts.
Representative figures from published 10% and synthetic-gel testing (Brass Fetcher, Field & Stream Bullet Lab, maker labs); exact depth shifts with medium, impact velocity and barrel.
Copper that opens like lead: the physics allows it. The shelf doesn’t sell it.
Petal copper pencils because its petals leave gaps: the effective face is about three-quarters of a disk, so the same retained mass drives 30″ instead of 21″. The invariant says the crush volume is identical; on an 18″ chest, 40% of it is spent in the dirt behind the animal.
Nothing forbids a full-face copper mushroom. Annealed copper yields near 70 MPa; the stagnation stress on the nose at 2,700 ft/s is ρv² ≈ 700 MPa, ten times that. A soft copper front bonded to a hard copper shank would open like lead and hold together like copper: f = 1, k = 1.9, 81% of the hole inside the animal and no lead in the meat.
Position of this deck, not a measured result. Published petal-copper depths run 22–32″; the 74% face is fitted to that range. The metallurgy argument is about yield stress, not about any product on sale.
The model that defuses the rest of the noise.
For any claim, ask: which variable does the work, which is merely correlated, and which is a logarithmic afterthought?
- Penetration = retained mass ÷ expanded frontal area, times ln(1 + u). Velocity has an elasticity near one quarter.
- Crush volume = m·ln(1 + u)/2κρ. Expansion trades depth for width at constant volume.
- Momentum is conserved: the animal is pushed less than the shooter. Wounding is what the crush cavity destroys.
- Sectional density buys depth and retained velocity together: the one quantity worth maximizing. Construction and placement dwarf the cartridge.
“Knockdown power,” magnum-versus-standard, barrel-length wars, the numbers printed on the box: all of it gets clear the moment you ask which quantity is actually doing the work.